| ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES |
| Dental Composites | |
| Strong and durable | Tooth sensitivity |
| Tooth colored | Technique sensitive |
| Single visit for fillings | Costs more than dental amalgam |
| Resists breaking | Shrinkage |
| Maximum amount of tooth preserved | Leakage over time |
| Does not corrode | |
| Frequency of repair or replacement is low | |
| Aesthetic Posts | |
| Good retention without extensive tooth preparation | Restorative material’s strength not increased |
| Less time consuming | Induces stress |
| Less expensive | Increased chances root canal perforation |
| Ceramic Crowns | |
| Esthetics | Expensive |
| Low thermal conductivity | Technique sensitive |
| No galvanic reactions | Post-operative pain from cementation |
| Biocompatible | Excessive wear of opposing tooth |
| CAD/CAM for Ceramic Restoration | |
| Independence | Cost |
| Reduced potential inaccuracies | Requirement of training |
| Single appointment | |
| Increased productivity | |
| Ceramic Veneers | |
| Esthetics | Brittle |
| Stain resistant | Irreversible application process |
| Durable | Cost |
| Smooth, translucent surface provides a natural appearance | Tooth sensitivity |